Assignments got your hair on fire?

Douse the flames with our full-range writing service!

Experienced academic writing professionals are at your fingertips. Use this handy tool to get a price estimate for your project.

NTSJC - The Synoptic Problem and Solutions

The site, maintained by Stephen Carlson, presents diagrams of two dozen possible theories to the Synoptic Problem, a brief bibliography, links for some important primary and secondary sources, and links to several other sites that defend other theories of the problem.

* This decision is not designed to reduce thenumber of steps in theories involving hypothetical sources soas to make them look more streamlined or parsimonious thanthey really are. To the contrary, the relative complexity ofsuch theories is highlighted in my system by the fact thateach individual literary relationship receives its ownhypothesis. Sticking to the three synoptics and no more willrequire only three hypotheses every time. Adding one extrasource into the mix, if one recalls that each such source mustbe connected to at least two of the synoptic gospels, willnecessarily require at least four hypotheses.

 Use a pencil or black pen to underline materials that are identical in  of the Synoptic Gospels:

("The Synoptic Problem and Q")

Many solutions to the synoptic problem have been proposed, and please seethe  for more information.

Although a few scholars at various times havesupported a largely oral solution(, ;;),a strong consensus among scholars has developed thatthere is indeed a documentary interrelationship betweenand among each of the synoptic gospels. There are fivemain, cumulative reasons for this conclusion:

Most introductions to the New Testament have at least a brief discussion of the Synoptic Problem. As critics of the Two-Document Hypothesis (2DH) have observed, the treatment of the Synoptic Problem is often far from even-handed, with various theorists either dismissing other theories as inadequate or not considering them at all. Kümmel’s otherwise masterful introduction to the New Testament () provides a detailed history of scholarship but is lacking in a full consideration of alternatives to the 2DH. gives careful attention to various logically possible theories, while ultimately favoring the 2DH. Both and are intended for the introductory student. Two online resources are available oriented to the novice, one maintained by Stephen Carlson () and the other by Mark Goodacre ().

Any proposed solution to the synoptic problem, ..

A careful treatment of New Testament source criticism, including a brief but clear presentation of the arrangements of the three gospels that are logically possible, given the array of Synoptic data. See especially pp. 115–155.

Goodacre, Mark S. The Synoptic Problem: A Way Through the Maze. The Biblical Seminar 80. London: Sheffield Academic Press, 2001.

3. Substantially similar selection ofmaterial, when that selection featuressome amount of creative, editorial choice. Jesusdid and said many things, so any account of hisministry must involve some editorial judgment inwhat to include and what to leave out. Thesynoptic gospels, for instance, relate many ofthe same miracles, but these miracles hardlyoverlap with the ones related by John.

Versatile Services that Make Studying Easy
We write effective, thought-provoking essays from scratch
We create erudite academic research papers
We champion seasoned experts for dissertations
We make it our business to construct successful business papers
What if the quality isn’t so great?
Our writers are sourced from experts, and complete an obstacle course of testing to join our brigade. Ours is a top service in the English-speaking world.
How do I know the professor won’t find out?
Everything is confidential. So you know your student paper is wholly yours, we use CopyScape and WriteCheck to guarantee originality (never TurnItIn, which professors patrol).
What if it doesn’t meet my expectations?
Unchanged instructions afford you 10 days to request edits after our agreed due date. With 94% satisfaction, we work until your hair is comfortably cool.
Clients enjoy the breezy experience of working with us
Click to learn our proven method

Any serious discussion of the Synoptic Gospels must, ..

Synoptic problem - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Option B, however, is a bit more complicated. I worded itin such a way as to eliminate from central consideration anytext, whether extant or nonextant, which does form a link between our synoptic gospels. Any text, forexample, thought to have served as a source for only one ofour synoptic gospels1 is not going to help usmake any decisions about relationships between each set of twosynoptic gospels. Such a source will simply contribute to thespecial material, or , of the gospel thatcopied from it. Likewise, any text thought to have copied fromone, two, or even all three of the synoptic gospels, but whichdid not serve as source for any of them,2 is goingto be of no help in making the necessary literarydecisions. Both of these kinds of texts will be peripheralto any proposed solution of the synoptic problem.

1,488 solutions to the Synoptic problem; Synoptic ..

An introductory level treatment of the Synoptic Problem that argues for Markan priority and the dependence of Luke on Matthew (hence, the Mark without Q (Farrer) Hypothesis (MwQH)). Critical of the 2DH, especially the arguments in favor of positing Q, Goodacre offers a careful and fair-minded analysis of the Synoptic Problem. Some attention is given to the Two-Gospel (Griesbach) Hypothesis (2GH), but none to complex theories.

Basics 1.1 What is the synoptic problem

1 Two examples of such a textwould be the M and L documents proposed by B. H. Streeter in. It does not matter to the synoptic problemproper whether Matthew and Luke (or Mark, for that matter) gottheir respective special materials from a written document orfrom an oral tradition, or even created them .(Of course, Streeter was aiming at more than asolution to the synoptic problem.)
2 The church fathers provide numerous examplesof such texts. They frequently copy from all three synopticgospels, but serve as the source for none of them. It doesnot matter to the synoptic problem proper how many subsequentauthors copied from Matthew, Mark, and Luke. The patristictexts may be invaluable to the reconstruction of therespective texts of the gospels, but their own relationshipsto the gospels do not constitute individual synoptichypotheses.

1.2 Why is the synoptic problem is important

Option A requires very little explanation. There are onlysix basic relationships possible amongst any set of threetexts. In the case of the synoptic problem those sixdirect relationships come out as the following list(call it list ):

The synoptic problem. - TextExcavation

The kind of source on the table in option B, then, is onewhich was copied by two or more of thesynoptic gospels both copied at least one and wascopied by at least one more. There are, therefore, two distinctlists of relationships under option B (call them lists and, and our source,whether extant or nonextant, will be X):

NT Blog: Mark Allan Powell on the Synoptic Problem

For my purposes, each synoptic hypothesis proposes adistinct literary relationship either (A) between any of the synoptic gospels or (B) between any of the synoptic gospels and any source, whetherextant or nonextant, that serves as a connection betweenat least two of the three.

of clients claim significantly improved grades thanks to our work.
of students agree they have more time for other things thanks to us.
Clients Speak
“I didn’t expect I’d be thanking you for actually improving my own writing, but I am. You’re like a second professor!”