Gabriel Kolko’s body of work has represented a significant addition to the revisionist interpretation, though it is not a product of the Wisconsin School. A representative example of his work is Century of War: Politics, Conflicts, and Society Since 1914 (New York: New Press, 1994). British forays into the scholarly US imperial field include Gareth Stedman Jones, “The History of U.S. Imperialism,” in Ideology in Social Science: Readings in Critical Social Theory, Ed. Robin Blackburn (Glasgow: William Collins, 1972), 207-237; and V.G. Kiernan, America, The New Imperialism: From White Settlement to World Hegemony (1978; New York: Verso, 2005).
While working though various definitions and theories of justice, additional engagement with relevant media supports an intentional consideration of the dynamics of forgiveness and reconciliation.
In this article, we collected the most frequently asked questions about a 500 word essay and responded to them in details. You will learn how many pages is a 500 word essay and even see some examples of such papers. Now you are saved as you can find all the answers you need below!
Explain what the idea of intersectionality entails and whether you think it is the most useful way to study gender inequality . What Awaits you: On-time delivery guarantee Masters and PhD-level writers Automatic plagiarism check 100% Privacy and Confidentiality High Quality custom-written papers
Before writing you should look over the examples of a 500 word essay and understand what exactly is expected from you. Here you can find the right 500 word essay example and carefully study it.
Like Du Bois, Harrison was one of the most sophisticated thinkers on empire of his day. He stressed the external expansion of US power over its domestically colonial attributes, but the way he entangled processes of racial formation and capital accumulation in the international arena, then cast this complexity upon the US example would not be matched in subtlety and sophistication for some time.
In the songs” Four Women”, “Young Gifted and Black”, and Mississippi God Damn”, Nina Simone musically maps a personal "intersectionality" as it relates to being a black American female artist.
The American Empire gave to the conquest of Indigenous territory and to slavery provided Nearing with one of the most enduring themes in the study of US empire, that of a tragic fall from the democratic promise of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. For Nearing, imperialism was a betrayal of “the tradition of America” established by the founders, comprised of “a hope, a faith, a conviction, a burning endeavor, centering in an ideal of liberty and justice for the human race.” Despite its many occlusions, oversights, and shortcomings, and despite the fact that Hubert Harrison pointed these out when The American Empire was published, Nearing’s view of US empire as a tragic fall from late eighteenth-century innocence retained its appeal.
Can the recent influx of immigrants successfully enter the mainstream of American life, or will many of them fail to thrive and become part of a permanent underclass? Achieving Anew examines immigrant life in school, at work, and in communities and demonstrates that recent immigrants and their children do make substantial progress over time, both within and between generations. From policymakers to private citizens, our national conversation on immigration has consistently questioned the country’s ability to absorb increasing numbers of foreign nationals—now nearly one million legal entrants per year. Using census data, longitudinal education surveys, and other data, Michael White and Jennifer Glick place their study of new immigrant achievement within a context of recent developments in assimilation theory and policies regulating who gets in and what happens to them upon arrival. They find that immigrant status itself is not an important predictor of educational achievement. First-generation immigrants arrive in the United States with less education than native-born Americans, but by the second and third generation, the children of immigrants are just as successful in school as native-born students with equivalent social and economic background. As with prior studies, the effects of socioeconomic background and family structure show through strongly. On education attainment, race and ethnicity have a strong impact on achievement initially, but less over time. Looking at the labor force, White and Glick find no evidence to confirm the often-voiced worry that recent immigrants and their children are falling behind earlier arrivals. On the contrary, immigrants of more recent vintage tend to catch up to the occupational status of natives more quickly than in the past. Family background, educational preparation, and race/ethnicity all play a role in labor market success, just as they do for the native born, but the offspring of immigrants suffer no disadvantage due to their immigrant origins. New immigrants continue to live in segregated neighborhoods, though with less prevalence than native black-white segregation. Immigrants who arrived in the 1960s are now much less segregated than recent arrivals. Indeed, the authors find that residential segregation declines both within and across generations. Yet black and Mexican immigrants are more segregated from whites than other groups, showing that race and economic status still remain powerful influences on where immigrants live. Although the picture is mixed and the continuing significance of racial factors remains a concern, Achieving Anew provides compelling reassurance that the recent wave of immigrants is making impressive progress in joining the American mainstream. The process of assimilation is not broken, the advent of a new underclass is not imminent, and the efforts to argue for the restriction of immigration based on these fears are largely mistaken.
Such affinities not only suggested an analogous relationship between the empires of Europe and the racial capitalism of the United States. The anticolonial ferment within the US that accompanied World War I and its aftermath encouraged an intersectional understanding of specifically US imperialism that advanced analyses of the race-class relation. The great Harlem orator, intellectual, and activist Hubert Harrison exemplified this progression in 1921:
On this account, that women and men ought to have equal rights andrespect is the normative claim; and that women are denied equal rightsand respect functions here as the descriptive claim. Admittedly, theclaim that women are disadvantaged with respect to rights and respectis not a “purely descriptive” claim since it plausiblyinvolves an evaluative component. However, our point here is simplythat claims of this sort concern what is the case not what ought to bethe case. Moreover, as indicated by the ellipsis above, thedescriptive component of a substantive feminist view will not bearticulable in a single claim, but will involve an account of thespecific social mechanisms that deprive women of, e.g., rights andrespect. For example, is the primary source of women's subordinationher role in the family? (Engels 1845; Okin 1989) Or is it her role inthe labor market? (Bergmann 2002) Is the problem males' tendencies tosexual violence (and what is the source of these tendencies?)?(Brownmiller 1975; MacKinnon 1987) Or is it simply women's biologicalrole in reproduction? (Firestone 1970)